<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/8207666?origin\x3dhttp://thirteeen.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Thursday, December 09, 2004
i decided today that OCOMM is very interesting. for the first lecture at least. there was this chart that goes something like..

sender > encode > message > channel > message > decode > receiver

encode is like, interpreting bits and pieces of the message the sender wants to put across. and i remember the lecturer saying something like "if the receiver received a wrong msg, then there is no mutuality between them." or something like that. i cant remember her exact words. and something like if when the sender sends the wrong msg, it meant that something went wrong. not during the encoding, not during the channel, or the decoding. the problem lies with the sender himself. that he came unprepared, which was why he gave the wrong msg. or something like that. i must be confusing you by now, but it was really interesting when i heard the lecturer say that. and my mind was like churning out lotsa stuff when i heard those words. and there was this line i clearly remembered, "there will be no need for encoding if we could read each other's mind." how cool. somehow i just felt like she was trying to tell me something. haha, not true but i guess i left that particular OCOMM lecture with some questions in my head answered.

you know how sometimes you try to make a particular eye contact or gesture without saying a word, then expecting your friends to get what you mean? but they dont? so its like, you dont have a mutual understanding with your friend, which is why you didnt get whatever he or she tried to tell you with that particular gesture. anyway im not trying to start a lecture here about oral communication or whatever. its just that, i feel this lecture somehow had a certain msg behind it. and i hope i got it. realising some things solved some questions in my head. and i guess both of us probably lacked mutual understanding somewhere along the way..or that we sent or received the wrong msg somewhere. oh well, just a thought. i sound kinda incohorent ehh? hmmm, hope this is more in depth than my shallow entries..lol. :P

12:19 AM



Comments: Post a Comment
ABOUT

thelastperfectthing@gmail.com


TAG



LINKS


DAILY FEEDS
Everybody wants a piece of Bryanboy
Yeeha Cowboy
Dubdew X Y Z
She knew you wouldn't understand
Fireangel
Snippets of life
How now brown cow?
Because he rather not be Daniel-san
Hush, they might hear you
Mac evangelist Popagandhi
Everybody has secrets
You've seen herbefore
Cameraphone-driven moblog
Waiter waiter
Insert witty quote here

OTHERS




Creative Commons Licence
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.
CREDITS
Blogger
Blogskins
Creator: Clara


Since 5th April 2005

ARCHIVES
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007


Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com